enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: how to identify a reputable journal writing tool
  2. etsy.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of academic databases and search engines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_academic_databases...

    The journals registered in this database underwent rigorous, multidimensional parameterization, proving high quality. The Ministry of Science and Higher Education acknowledged the IC Journal Master List by placing it on the list of scored databases, for being indexed in IC JML journals get additional points in the Ministry’s evaluation process.

  3. Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    When writing about any health effect, assessing evidence quality helps distinguish between minor and major views, determine due weight, and identify accepted evidence-based information. Even in reputable medical journals, different papers are not given equal weight.

  4. Wikipedia:Identifying and using tertiary sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and...

    The medium is not the message; source evaluation is an evaluation of content, not publication format. Sometimes high-quality, generally tertiary individual sources are also primary or secondary sources for some material. Two examples are etymological research that is the original work of a dictionary's staff (primary); and analytical not just regurgitative material in a topical encycl

  5. CRAAP test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRAAP_test

    In a 2017 article, Cara Berg, a reference librarian and co-coordinator of user education at William Paterson University, emphasizes website evaluation as a tool for active research. [5] At Berg's university, for example, library instruction is given to roughly 300 classes in different subjects that involve research requiring students to look up ...

  6. Wikipedia : Identifying and using self-published works

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and...

    If the journal rejects the article, the author is free to submit it to another journal. The author writes a whole paper. The author finds a predatory publisher with a pay-to-publish model. The article is not peer reviewed. All articles that are plausibly connected to the journal's subject are accepted – as long as the payment has been received.

  7. Wikipedia:Reliable sources checklist - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources...

    Size doesn't prove anything, but it's a data point. The New England Journal of Medicine and the North Carolina Literary Review are both scholarly journals, but they're not equal. Ditto the New York Times and the Easton (Maryland) Gazette. A bigger operation means more resources for fact-checking, a bigger reputation to uphold, and greater ...

  8. Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (science) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...

  9. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    Ideal sources for biomedical information include general or systematic reviews in reliable, independent, published sources, such as reputable medical journals, widely recognised standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or medical guidelines and position statements from nationally or internationally reputable expert bodies.

  1. Ad

    related to: how to identify a reputable journal writing tool