Ad
related to: supreme court arbitration rules
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Act stipulates that arbitration in a majority of instances is legal when both parties, either after or prior to the arising of a dispute, agree to the arbitration. The Supreme Court has taken a pro-arbitration stance across most but not all cases, although the federal government, most recently in 2022, has passed certain exemptions to ...
Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc., 586 U.S. ___ (2019), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on January 8, 2019. The case decided the question of whether a court may disregard a valid delegation of arbitrability—a contract provision stating that an arbitrator should decide whether a dispute is subject to arbitration—when the argument in favor of ...
FINRA rules require arbitration through a FINRA arbitration panel, except in the case of class actions, which are reserved for the court system. Specifically, the OHO Panel cited the Supreme Court decision in Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon that securities law claims are no exception to the FAA's mandate that parties to an otherwise ...
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday backed cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase Global Inc's bid to halt customer lawsuits while it pursues appeals aimed at moving the disputes out of courts and into ...
RBG stood up against the Supreme Court after it ruled that employers can use arbitration agreements to keep workers from filing class-action lawsuits.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to hear a dispute over Coinbase's effort to move a dispute with users of the cryptocurrency exchange out of courts and into private arbitration, which ...
Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson, 561 U.S. 63 (2010): A court must decide whether or not an arbitration clause is unconscionable, even if the contract unequivocally states that the arbitrator must make that decision. Granite Rock Co. v. Teamsters, 561 U.S. 287 (2010) AT&T Mobility LLC v.
Southland Corp. v. Keating, 465 U.S. 1 (1984), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning arbitration.It was originally brought by 7-Eleven franchisees in California state courts, alleging breach of contract by the chain's then parent corporation.
Ad
related to: supreme court arbitration rules