enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Relevance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Relevance

    Following is an approach to determine and name degrees of relevance and how to utilize the results: Relevance level "High" – The highest relevance is objective information directly about the topic of the article. "John Smith is a member of the XYZ organization" in the "John Smith" article is an example of this.

  3. Relevance feedback - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevance_feedback

    Relevance feedback is a feature of some information retrieval systems. The idea behind relevance feedback is to take the results that are initially returned from a given query, to gather user feedback, and to use information about whether or not those results are relevant to perform a new query. We can usefully distinguish between three types ...

  4. Wikipedia:Relevance emerges - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Relevance_emerges

    When not obvious, relevance is decided by the editors of the article, based on what is considered likely to be useful to readers. The give and take between editors functions as a social-engine for discerning relevance. Wikipedia policy maintains the health of that social engine but does not itself act as an engine for discerning relevance.

  5. Wikipedia:Relevance/Review A - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Relevance/Review_A

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us

  6. Wikipedia:Article Feedback/Help/Editors - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Feedback/...

    Its purpose is to help editors improve the article based on reader feedback. To see the feedback page for this test sample, click on “Talk” at the top of the article page; then click on “View reader feedback” at the top of the talk page. For example, take a look at the feedback page for the Golden-crowned Sparrow. (Tech note: feedback ...

  7. Wikipedia:Article feedback - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_feedback

    You can view feedback in a number of places: This central feedback page for all of Wikipedia; This sample article feedback page; On other articles with feedback, (Look for a link on these article talkpages to see feedback. Note that only about 10 percent of articles have feedback so far.)

  8. Wikipedia:Notability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability

    Article and list topics must be notable, or "worthy of notice". Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity—although those may enhance the acceptability of a subject that meets the guidelines explained below. A topic is presumed to merit an article if:

  9. Wikipedia:Feedback walkthrough - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Feedback_walkthrough

    Article feedback was found at the bottom of many Wikipedia articles; it is a simple form that readers can use to submit suggestions for improvement. (See screenshot below.) These suggestions are then reviewed by Wikipedia contributors, who can identify and take action on useful feedback -- while ignoring or removing bad submissions.