Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, No. 16-1466, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), abbreviated Janus v.AFSCME, is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on US labor law, concerning the power of labor unions to collect fees from non-union members.
Service Employees International Union Local 1000 is the largest labor union in California, with bargaining rights for half of all California state employees. [7] In June 2005 SEIU sent out its annual Hudson notice, giving nonmembers thirty days to opt out of union dues and only pay a fair share fee. [8]
At 7.25%, California has the highest minimum statewide sales tax rate in the United States, [8] which can total up to 10.75% with local sales taxes included. [9]Sales and use taxes in California (state and local) are collected by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration, whereas income and franchise taxes are collected by the Franchise Tax Board.
Where the agency shop is illegal, as is common in labor law governing American public sector unions, a "fair share provision" may be agreed to by the union and the employer. [2] [3] The provision requires non-union employees to pay a "fair share fee" to cover the costs of the union's collective bargaining activities. The "fair share" is similar ...
In June 2018, the Supreme Court ruled against a law that required non-union workers to pay “fair share” fees if their workplace has a union. These fees went toward collective bargaining.
California companies that go public, for example, can create a stock windfall for its founders and big tax bills. In 2022 and 2023, the number of companies that went public is down 80% compared to ...
AFSCME case, which ended the compulsion of non-union, public employees to pay agency fees, or what are colloquially known as 'fair-share fees,' the NEA's total membership and agency fee payers dropped from 3,074,841 on its November 28, 2017, report [33] to 2,975,933 in its August 31, 2019, report, [34] a total loss of 98,908 dues payers.
California passed its domestic partnership statute in 1999, defining it as two adults who share their lives in “an intimate and committed relationship of mutual caring,” regardless of gender ...