Ad
related to: notice of strike in california supreme court case lookup albuquerquecourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
- County Court Records
Easily Search Court Records Online
Just Enter A Name & Choose A State
- State Court Record Search
Search Our Database For Court Info
Answer Your Burning Questions Now!
- Criminal Court Records
See If Anyone Has Been To Court
Browse Up To Date Court Records
- Public Court Records
See Public Public Court Records
Millions Of Citizens. Search Today!
- County Court Records
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The People of the State of California v. Superior Court (Romero), 13 CAL. 4TH 497, 917 P.2D 628 (Cal. 1996), was a landmark case in the state of California that gave California Superior Court judges the ability to dismiss a criminal defendant's "strike prior" pursuant to the California Three-strikes law, thereby avoiding a 25-to-life minimum sentence.
Defendant convicted in Los Angeles County Superior Court; conviction affirmed by California Court of Appeal; California Supreme Court declined review, and the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari, 535 U.S. 969 (2002). Holding; California's three strikes law does not violate the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.
A motion to strike is a request by one party in a United States trial requesting that the presiding judge order the removal of all or part of the opposing party's pleading to the court. These motions are most commonly sought by the defendant, as to a matter contained in the plaintiff's complaint; however, they may also be asserted by plaintiffs ...
The litigation, filed directly in the California Supreme Court in an unusual move, comes as advocates have grown increasingly frustrated by the documented inability of many courts to find and hire ...
More than 300 published court opinions have interpreted and applied California's anti-SLAPP law. [3] Because the right to file a special motion to strike is substantive immunity to suit , rather than a merely procedural right, federal courts apply the law to state law claims they hear under diversity jurisdiction .
The California Supreme Court ruling curtails the ability of public employees in the state to seek help from the courts in labor disputes.
Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63 (2003), [1] decided the same day as Ewing v. California (a case with a similar subject matter), [2] held that there would be no relief by means of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus from a sentence imposed under California's three strikes law as a violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday dealt another setback to organized labor by making it easier for employers to sue over strikes that cause property destruction in a ruling siding with a concrete ...
Ad
related to: notice of strike in california supreme court case lookup albuquerquecourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month