Ads
related to: ohio court case number search californiacourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
- Court Criminal Check
Court Records, Millions Of Citizens
Available In Our Database. Search
- Public Court Records
See Public Public Court Records
Millions Of Citizens. Search Today!
- County Court Records
Easily Search Court Records Online
Just Enter A Name & Choose A State
- State Court Record Search
Search Our Database For Court Info
Answer Your Burning Questions Now!
- Court Criminal Check
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969), was a 1969 United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that police officers arresting a person at his home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, but that police may search the area within immediate reach of the person without a warrant. [1]
Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), [1] is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that the warrantless search and seizure of the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.
Case history; Prior: A. Philip Randolph Inst. v. Husted, 838 F.3d 699 (6th Cir. 2016); cert. granted, 137 S. Ct. 2188 (2017).: Holding; Both the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the Help America Vote Act of 2002, as prescribed by law in 52 U.S.C. § 20507, permit Ohio to have a list-maintenance process that removes people from the state's on the basis of inactivity.
G.R. No. 180643 is the case docket number originally assigned by the Supreme Court at the time the action was filed with the Court (G.R. stands for General Register) [15] [16] 25 March 2008 is the exact date the decision of this case was promulgated; 549 is the volume number of the Supreme Court Reports Annotated where the case may be found
Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court affirmed the California Court of Appeal's ruling that suspicionless searches of parolees are lawful under California law and that the search in this case was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution because it was not arbitrary, capricious, or harassing.
There are twelve appellate districts, each consisting of at least one county, and the number of judges in each district varies from four to twelve. Each case is heard by a three-judge panel. There are currently 69 courts of appeals judges as provided by statute. A court of appeals judge is an elected position, with a term of six years.
Ads
related to: ohio court case number search californiacourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month