enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Duty to warn - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_warn

    In clinical psychological practice in the United States, duty to warn requires a clinician who has reasonable grounds to believe that a client may be in imminent danger of harming themselves or others to warn the possible victims. [12] Duty to warn is among the few exceptions to a client's right to confidentiality and the therapist's ethical ...

  3. Ewing v. Goldstein - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ewing_v._Goldstein

    Ewing v. Goldstein 15 Cal. Rptr. 3d 864 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004) is a landmark court case that extended California mental health professional's duty to protect identifiable victims of potentially violent persons, as established by Tarasoff v.

  4. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarasoff_v._Regents_of_the...

    Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient.

  5. Justices to Determine Scope of Mental Health Professionals ...

    www.aol.com/news/justices-determine-scope-mental...

    The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments over whether mental health professionals have a duty to warn of threats against a group of unspecified individuals.

  6. Duty to protect - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_protect

    In medical law and medical ethics, the duty to protect is the responsibility of a mental health professional to protect patients and others from foreseeable harm. [1] If a client makes statements that suggest suicidal or homicidal ideation, the clinician has the responsibility to take steps to warn potential victims, and if necessary, initiate involuntary commitment.

  7. Proposed conversion therapy ban creates ‘thought crime ...

    www.aol.com/proposed-conversion-therapy-ban...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  8. Jablonski by Pahls v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jablonski_by_Pahls_v...

    Jablonski by Pahls v. United States, 712 F.2d 391 (9th Cir. 1983) [1] is a landmark case in which the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals determined that a mental health professional's duty to predict dangerousness includes consulting a patient's prior records, and that their duty to protect includes the involuntary commitment of a dangerous individual; simply warning the foreseeable victim is ...

  9. Moral Injury: The Grunts - The ... - The Huffington Post

    projects.huffingtonpost.com/projects/moral...

    Most people enter military service “with the fundamental sense that they are good people and that they are doing this for good purposes, on the side of freedom and country and God,” said Dr. Wayne Jonas, a military physician for 24 years and president and CEO of the Samueli Institute, a non-profit health research organization.