Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Oxford Handbook of the Study of Religion is a scholarly book about the academic study of religion. Edited by Michael Stausberg and Steven Engler , the book was published in the United Kingdom in 2016.
This page was last edited on 16 February 2020, at 16:46 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.
Handbook of Religion and Health is a scholarly book about the relation of spirituality and religion with physical and mental health. Written by Harold G. Koenig, Michael E. McCullough, and David B. Larson, the first edition was published in the United States in 2001.
Player's Handbook A Practical Reference to Religious Diversity for Operational Police and Emergency Services The Preparation of Programs for an Electronic Digital Computer
Religion past & present: Encyclopedia of theology and religion. Brill, 2007–2010. ISBN 90-04-14666-0. [5] Bishop, Peter and Michael Barton. Encyclopedia of World Faiths: An Illustrated Survey of the World's Living Religions. Facts on File, 1988. [1] Bowker, John Westerdale. The Oxford dictionary of world religions. Oxford University Press, 1997.
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is Not § Wikipedia is not a soapbox – policy; covers religious promotion/opposition; Wikipedia:Fringe theories – guideline may cover some faith-based arguments against science, though not disputes between faiths; Wikipedia:Religion – failed policy proposal (2012)
The Handbook of Denominations in the United States, also known as Abingdon's Handbook of Denominations or just the Handbook of Denominations, originally by Frank S. Mead, editor of the Christian Herald, is a reference work on religious denominations, particularly but not exclusively Christian ones, based in North America or extensively represented there (i.e., the Roman Catholic Church).
Religion is the substance, the ground, and the depth of man's spiritual life." [83] When religion is seen in terms of sacred, divine, intensive valuing, or ultimate concern, then it is possible to understand why scientific findings and philosophical criticisms (e.g., those made by Richard Dawkins) do not necessarily disturb its adherents. [84]