enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Demandingness objection - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demandingness_objection

    The demandingness objection is a common [1] [2] argument raised against utilitarianism and other consequentialist ethical theories. The consequentialist requirement that we maximize the good impartially seems to this objection to require us to perform acts that we would normally consider optional.

  3. Utilitarianism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

    A common objection to utilitarianism is the inability to quantify, compare, or measure happiness or well-being. Rachael Briggs writes in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: [80] One objection to this interpretation of utility is that there may not be a single good (or indeed any good) which rationality requires us to seek.

  4. Utility monster - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utility_monster

    Robert Nozick, a twentieth century American philosopher, coined the term "utility monster" in response to Jeremy Bentham's philosophy of utilitarianism.Nozick proposed that accepting the theory of utilitarianism causes the necessary acceptance of the condition that some people would use this to justify exploitation of others.

  5. Negative utilitarianism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_utilitarianism

    Lexical threshold" negative utilitarianism says that there is some disutility, for instance some extreme suffering, such that no positive utility can counterbalance it. [24] 'Consent-based' negative utilitarianism is a specification of lexical threshold negative utilitarianism, which specifies where the threshold should be located.

  6. Act utilitarianism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_utilitarianism

    Act utilitarianism is a utilitarian theory of ethics that states that a person's act is morally right if and only if it produces the best possible results in that specific situation. Classical utilitarians, including Jeremy Bentham , John Stuart Mill , and Henry Sidgwick , define happiness as pleasure and the absence of pain.

  7. Alastair Norcross - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alastair_Norcross

    In ethics, Norcross defends a version of act utilitarianism known as scalar utilitarianism, which is the theory that there are no right or wrong actions, only better or worse actions ranked along a continuum from the action (or actions) that contributes most to overall utility to the action (or actions) that contributes the least.

  8. On Liberty - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Liberty

    On Liberty is an essay published in 1859 by the English philosopher John Stuart Mill.It applied Mill's ethical system of utilitarianism to society and state. [1] [2] Mill suggested standards for the relationship between authority and liberty.

  9. Rule utilitarianism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_utilitarianism

    Rule utilitarianism is a form of utilitarianism that says an action is right as it conforms to a rule that leads to the greatest good, or that "the rightness or wrongness of a particular action is a function of the correctness of the rule of which it is an instance". [1]