Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Consensus is an ongoing process on Wikipedia; it is often better to accept a less-than-perfect compromise—with the understanding that the page is gradually improving—than to try to fight to implement a particular preferred version immediately.
Advanced search options in various search engines (like DuckDuckGo or Google) can help to pinpoint coverage about topics. To narrow searches to specific sites, here's something that works in DuckDuckGo and Google searches (be sure to include the topic in quotation marks): "Search topic" site:www.siteexample.com This generates results only from ...
Other sources may require discussion to gain consensus that the source can be used for that particular content. In other cases, a consensus has been formed to not use a given source. In such cases, especially if the reasons for unreliability are not obvious, it may be helpful to subsequent editors if editors post a note about this (e.g., on the ...
Search engine for natural and physical sciences, social sciences, and humanities. Incorporates arXiv, PubMed, and SciELO. Integrated with ORCID for overlay and peer review services. All articles display Altmetric scores. Free ScienceOpen [135] Scientific Information Database (SID) Engineering, technology, medical science, basic science, human ...
Cross-platform open-source desktop search engine. Unmaintained since 2011-06-02 [9]. LGPL v2 [10] Terrier Search Engine: Linux, Mac OS X, Unix: Desktop search for Windows, Mac OS X (Tiger), Unix/Linux. MPL v1.1 [11] Tracker: Linux, Unix: Open-source desktop search tool for Unix/Linux GPL v2 [12] Tropes Zoom: Windows: Semantic Search Engine (no ...
Wikipedia editors have created custom Google search engines to help find sources on websites that Wikipedia editors have determined are generally more reliable. Several general search engines exist for more academic material, particularly scholarly articles, although some content will be behind a paywall: examples are Google Scholar , BASE and ...
Academic search engine - the topic is needed for the inclusion and exclusion of the articles listed in this article--222.67.215.118 09:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC) Actually I don't believe that Web of Science or Ovid are search engines; they are bibliographic databases.
Editors should avoid original research especially with regard to making blanket statements based on novel syntheses of disparate material. Stated simply, any statement in Wikipedia that academic consensus exists on a topic must be sourced rather than being based on the opinion or assessment of editors.