enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Non-compete clauses in the United States - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-compete_clauses_in_the...

   A leading court decision discussing the conflict between California law and the laws of other states is the 1998 California 4th District Court of Appeal decision Application Group, Inc. v. Hunter Group, Inc. [18] In Hunter, a Maryland company required that its Maryland-based employee agree to a one-year non-compete agreement. The contract ...

3. Non-disclosure agreement - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-disclosure_agreement

   Many banking institutions maintain client privacy through confidentiality agreements. Some, akin to attorney–client privilege, offer banker–client privilege.. A non-disclosure agreement (NDA), also known as a confidentiality agreement (CA), confidential disclosure agreement (CDA), proprietary information agreement (PIA), or secrecy agreement (SA), is a legal contract or part of a contract ...

4. Confidentiality club - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidentiality_club

   In English legal proceedings, a confidentiality club (also known as confidentiality ring) [1] is an agreement occasionally reached by parties to a litigation to reduce the risk of confidential documents being used outside the litigation. The agreement typically provides that only specified persons can access some documents.

5. Non-compete clause - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-compete_clause

   A few states, such as California, North Dakota, and Oklahoma, totally ban noncompete agreements for employees, or prohibit all noncompete agreements except in limited circumstances. [ 33 ] Data from 2018 indicates that non-compete clauses cover 18 percent of American labor force participants . [ 34 ]

6. California Consumer Privacy Act - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Consumer...

   The bill was passed by the California State Legislature and signed into law by the Governor of California, Jerry Brown, on June 28, 2018, to amend Part 4 of Division 3 of the California Civil Code. [2] Officially called AB-375, the act was introduced by Ed Chau, member of the California State Assembly, and State Senator Robert Hertzberg. [3] [4]

7. National security letter - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Letter

   In March 2008, the Second Circuit ruled that nondisclosure provisions were permissible only when the FBI certified that disclosure may result in certain statutorily enumerated harms (see, e.g., 18 U.S.C. 2709), and held the nondisclosure provision to a strict scrutiny standard. The Second Circuit then returned the case to the district court ...