Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Adam Smith, the father of modern economics, is often cited as arguing for the "invisible hand" and free markets: firms, in the pursuit of profits, are led, as if by an invisible hand, to do what is best for the world. But unlike his followers, Adam Smith was aware of some of the limitations of free markets, and research since then has further ...
The Vanishing Hand theory is a concept first conceived of by economist Richard Normand Langlois. [1] The term is an intentional play on both Adam Smith 's invisible hand and Alfred Chandler 's Visible Hand .
The philosopher and economist Adam Smith opposes this (although he defends a moderated version of this line of thought in his theory of the invisible hand), since Mandeville fails, in his opinion, to distinguish between vice and virtue.
In economics the "visible hand" is generally considered to be the macro-fiscal policy of John Keynes that emerged in the 1930s as a remedy for the shortcomings of Adam Smith's "invisible hand" and advocated government intervention in the economy. [4] Actually, Smith already identified the disadvantages of the "invisible hand". [5]
Social agents act according to their "feel for the game" (the "feel" being, roughly, habitus, and the "game" being the field). [ 40 ] Other social scientists, inspired in part by Bourdieu's thinking have expressed concern about the inappropriate use of economic metaphors in other contexts, suggesting that this may have political implications.
Firms and consumers take prices as given (no economic actor or group of actors has market power). The theorem is sometimes seen as an analytical confirmation of Adam Smith's "invisible hand" principle, namely that competitive markets ensure an efficient allocation of resources.
AI developers and investors are looking to create digital economic actors, with the capacity to do just about anything. How to prevent millions of invisible law-free AI agents casually wreaking ...
Although the book was described by the Cato Institute as among the greatest economics books in the 20th century, and A Monetary History of the United States is widely considered to be among the most influential economics books ever made, [248] [249] it has endured criticisms for its conclusion that the Federal Reserve was to blame for the Great ...