Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
These rules set a high priority on attempts to resolve all matters able to be resolved by the parties, prior to hearing (or trial). The pleadings are contained in various Statements of Case - usually the Claim and any associated Particulars of Claim, the Defence, and an optional reply to the Defence.
The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provide in rule 7(f) that "the court may direct the government to file a bill of particulars".. In U.S. state law, the bill of particulars was abolished in nearly all court systems in the 1940s and 1950s due to the widespread recognition that much of the information requested could be obtained more efficiently through the discovery process.
New facts must be specially pleaded. 3 Denial to be specific. 4 Evasive denial. 5 Specific denial. 6 Particulars of set-off to be given in written statement. Effect of set-off. 6A Counter-claim by defendant. 6B Counter-claim to be stated. 6C Exclusion of counter-claim. 6D Effect of discontinuance of suit. 6E Default of plaintiff to reply to ...
"Construction of a deed is a matter of law, and the intention of the parties is to be gathered from the four corners of the instrument." [ 5 ] Looking at the four corners of the will : examining and analyzing the will.
Due to the exacting nature of legal forms and the time and effort required to prepare legal documents, form books were created as an aid in the drafting process. [3] These books conserve time and serve as a reference to attorneys and law students seeking to use them in their practice.
A peremptory plea had only one kind: a plea in bar. A party making a plea in bar could either traverse the other side's pleading (i.e., deny all or some of the facts pleaded) or confess and avoid it (i.e., admit the facts pleaded but plead new ones that would dispel their effect). A traverse could be general (deny everything) or specific.
While legal conclusions can provide the framework of a complaint, they must be supported by factual allegations. When there are well-pleaded factual allegations, a court should assume their veracity and then determine whether they plausibly give rise to an entitlement to relief. Our decision in Twombly illustrates the two-pronged approach.
If the application is granted, the matter is referred to the higher court. This usually takes the form "were we/was I correct to ..." and then the specified aspect of law to which the appeal relates. If the application to state a case is refused, the applicant may be able to seek redress by judicial review. The higher court will determine ...