Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Attribution, in copyright law, is acknowledgment as credit to the copyright holder or author of a work. If a work is under copyright, there is a long tradition of the author requiring attribution while directly quoting portions of work created by that author.
If you encounter a harmless statement that lacks attribution, you can tag it with the {} template, or move it to the article's talk page with a comment requesting attribution. If the whole article is unsourced, you can use the {{unreferenced}} template; for sections requiring sourcing, {{unreferenced section}} is available. Absurd unsourced ...
Attribution (journalism), the identification of the source of reported information; Attribution (law), legal doctrines by which liability is extended to a defendant who did not actually commit the criminal act; Attribution (marketing), concept in marketing of assigning a value to a marketing activity based on desired outcome
While any edit lacking attribution may be removed, the best practice is try to find a source for it; dispute the statement on the talk page, perhaps moving it there; add the {} template to request a citation, add the {} template to request attribution; or; remove it.
Eulogy – a speech or writing in praise of a person, especially one who recently died or retired. Euphemism – an innocuous, inoffensive or circumlocutory term or phrase for something unpleasant or obscene—e.g., in advertising for female hygiene products any liquid shown is never red, it's usually blue.
Do not use similar or related words in a way that blurs meaning or is incorrect or distorting. For example, the adjective Arab refers to people and things of ethnic Arab origin. The term Arabic generally refers to the Arabic language or writing system, and related concepts.
"Say where you read it" follows the practice in academic writing of citing sources directly only if you have read the source yourself. If your knowledge of the source is secondhand—that is, if you have read Jones (2010), who cited Smith (2009), and you want to use what Smith (2009) said—make clear that your knowledge of Smith is based on ...
The policies do not require checking the truth but do require checking for attribution; however, when Wikipedians go through the motions of checking for attribution, they are, in most cases at least, intentionally and actually checking for accuracy in the sense of conformity to the real world, at least at a good level of confidence.