enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928) The Fourth Amendment's proscription on unreasonable search and seizure does not apply to telephone wiretaps. (Overruled by Katz v. United States (1967)) Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) Exclusionary rule applied to state prosecutions. Schmerber v.

  3. Ohio v. American Express Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_v._American_Express_Co.

    Ohio v. American Express Co., 585 U.S. ___ (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the nature of antitrust law in relationship to two-sided markets.The case specifically involves policies set by some credit card banks that prevented merchants from steering customers to use cards from other issuers with lower transaction fees, forcing merchants to pay higher transaction fees to ...

  4. Lists of United States Supreme Court cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_United_States...

    Jay, Rutledge, and Ellsworth Courts (October 19, 1789 – December 15, 1800); Marshall Court (February 4, 1801 – July 6, 1835); Taney Court (March 28, 1836 – October 12, 1864)

  5. Haitian group's court case against Trump, Vance referred to ...

    www.aol.com/haitian-groups-court-case-against...

    He ran for the Democratic nomination for Ohio attorney general in 2006. mfilby@dispatch.com @MaxFilby This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: Court refers Haitian group's case ...

  6. Two rulings against open records. Is Ohio Supreme Court ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/two-rulings-against-open-records...

    In a matter of four months, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled against releasing information in two public records cases, and it is now weighing what to do two other high-profile records fights.

  7. Mapp v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mapp_v._Ohio

    Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents a prosecutor from using evidence that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, applies to states as well as the federal government.

  8. Grisly video emerges of Ohio woman allegedly killing, eating ...

    www.aol.com/grisly-video-emerges-ohio-woman...

    Grisly video has emerged of a blood-soaked woman after she was allegedly caught killing and eating a cat in Ohio — but she’s neither a Haitian migrant nor anywhere near Springfield.

  9. Ohio v. Robinette - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_v._Robinette

    Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33 (1996), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to inform a motorist at the end of a traffic stop that they are free to go before seeking permission to search the motorist's car.