enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. US Supreme Court appears split over US agency powers in ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-may-reel-us...

    Biden's administration has said the program is authorized under a 1976 federal law called the Magnuson-Stevens Act to protect against overfishing in U.S. coastal waters. It said in court papers ...

  3. US Supreme Court curbs federal agency powers, overturning ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-curbs-federal...

    The Biden administration said the program was authorized under a 1976 federal law called the Magnuson-Stevens Act to protect against overfishing in U.S. coastal waters.

  4. US agency powers back on Supreme Court's hook in ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/us-agency-powers-back-supreme...

    The administration has argued that the fisheries service program is authorized under a 1976 U.S. law called the Magnuson-Stevens Act to protect against overfishing in U.S. coastal waters.

  5. Hawaii Division of Conservation and Resource Enforcement

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii_Division_of...

    It is tasked with full state police powers to enforces all State laws and Department rules, with primary jurisdiction involving State lands, State Parks, historical sites, forest reserves, aquatic life and wildlife areas, coastal zones, Conservation districts, State shores, as well as county ordinances involving county parks, for enforcing ...

  6. Magnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnuson–Stevens_Fishery...

    The Magnuson–Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act is the primary law governing marine fisheries management in United States federal waters. The law is named after U.S. Senators Warren G. Magnuson of Washington state and Ted Stevens of Alaska, who sponsored the Senate bill, S. 200, that eventually was enacted.

  7. County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/County_of_Maui_v._Hawaii...

    Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case involving pollution discharges under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The case asked whether the Clean Water Act requires a permit when pollutants that originate from a non-point source can be traced to reach navigable waters through mechanisms such as ...

  8. Supreme Court tumbles in public opinion: Can it sink lower ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-tumbles-public-opinion...

    The herring fishermen behind the lawsuit objected to a requirement that they pay for federal monitors onboard to protect against overfishing. Since then, the rule has been rescinded, and the ...

  9. Illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal,_unreported_and...

    Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing poses a global challenge and has significant economic and environmental repercussions. [5] The impact of IUU fishing includes economic losses, job losses, scarcity, price distortion, food insecurity and unfair competition, [6] together with the depletion of fish populations and damages to the marine habitat. [7]