enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Just war theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_war_theory

    In the just war theory as it pertains to jus in bello, traditionalist scholars view that the two principles, jus ad bellum and jus in bello, are distinct in which actors in war are morally responsible. The traditional view places accountability on leaders who start the war, while soldiers are accountable for actions breaking jus in bello. [69]

  3. Law of war - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_war

    The idea that there is a right to war concerns, on the one hand, the jus ad bellum, the right to make war or to enter war, assuming a motive such as to defend oneself from a threat or danger, presupposes a declaration of war that warns the adversary: war is a loyal act, and on the other hand, jus in bello, the law of war, the way of making war ...

  4. Jus ad bellum - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_ad_bellum

    Jus ad bellum is one pillar of just war theory. Just war theory states that war should only be condoned under 'just' conditions. [2] Jus ad bellum simply limits the causes for which war can be considered justifiable. [2] The other parts of just war theory include jus in bello (just actions in war) and jus post bellum (justice after war). [2]

  5. International humanitarian law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_humanitarian_law

    International humanitarian law (IHL), also referred to as the laws of armed conflict, is the law that regulates the conduct of war (jus in bello). [1] [2] It is a branch of international law that seeks to limit the effects of armed conflict by protecting persons who are not participating in hostilities and by restricting and regulating the means and methods of warfare available to combatants.

  6. Supreme emergency - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_emergency

    In most modern conceptions of just war theory, there are two categories that the moral justification of a war are assessed: jus ad bellum or justice before the war and jus in bello or justice during the war. [3]: 21 Brian Orend includes a third category, jus post bellum or justice after the war. [4]

  7. Jus post bellum - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_post_bellum

    Jus post bellum (/ j uː s / YOOS; Latin for "Justice after war") is a concept that deals with the morality of the termination phase of war, including the responsibility to rebuild. The idea has some historical pedigree as a concept in just war theory. [1] In modern times, it has been developed by a number of just war theorists and ...

  8. EU leaders to huddle on defence against Russia and ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/eu-leaders-huddle-defence...

    European countries have ramped up defence spending in recent years, particularly since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, which brought war to the EU's borders. But many EU leaders have said they ...

  9. Just and Unjust Wars - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_and_Unjust_Wars

    Walzer draws on medieval Just War theory to explore the reasons that can justify war jus ad bellum and the ethical limits on the conduct of war jus in bello in an attempt to work out a modern, secular theory of just war. [1] Walzer precises that in war not all action is equal, a just war exists and must be implemented through a strict display ...