Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson was a criminal trial in Los Angeles County Superior Court, in which former NFL player and actor O. J. Simpson was tried and acquitted for the murders of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ron Goldman, who were stabbed to death outside Brown's condominium in Los Angeles on June 12, 1994.
“In my obituary, they’ll say, ‘the disgraced racist detective in the O.J. Simpson case,’” former Los Angeles Police Department Detective Mark Fuhrman said in Netflix’s new documentary ...
The O.J. Simpson trial was a turning point in cultural history that changed the way media and news are consumed. ... own celebrity factored into why the case had an unprecedented amount of media ...
The case for another O.J. Simpson documentary in 2025. The O.J. Simpson case was not only a case about domestic violence, but also a case about race. A central part of the defense’s argument was ...
Simpson was inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame in 1985, his first year of eligibility. [55] In 2019, he was named to the National Football League 100th Anniversary All-Time Team. [56] Simpson also occasionally returned kickoffs during his early career, finishing with 33 returns for 990 yards and a touchdown, an average of 30 yards per ...
Detective Philip Vannatter testified that Simpson volunteered to give some blood for comparison to the evidence samples. Peratis drew an undocumented amount from Simpson on June 13 at approximately 3:30 pm, sealing it in an envelope, and gave it to Vannatter.
Simpson was sentenced to a minimum of nine years and maximum of 33. Key facts about O.J. Simpson: If the Pro Football Hall of Famer is granted parole, he could be released from prison on Oct. 1.
[163] [164] [165] Gerdes later admitted there was no contamination in the Simpson case. [166] [167] Fujisaki also prohibited the defense from referencing Fuhrman's racism or perjury at the civil trial because the defense could not "show it had anything directly to do with this case" and the perjury "was not material to any facts in this case".