Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The other aspects of fiduciary duty are a director's duty of loyalty and (possibly) duty of good faith. Put simply, a director owes a duty to exercise good business judgment and to use ordinary care and prudence in the operation of the business. They must discharge their actions in good faith and in the best interest of the corporation ...
directors owe duties to the corporation, [1] and not to individual shareholders, [2] employees or creditors outside exceptional circumstances; directors' core duty is to remain loyal to the company, and avoid conflicts of interest; directors are expected to display a high standard of care, skill or diligence; directors are expected to act in ...
The all-important duty of care is found in section 174. Directors must display the care, skill and competence that is reasonable for somebody carrying out the functions of the office, and if a director has any special qualifications an even higher standard will be expected.
Given that the directors cannot ensure corporate success, the business judgment rule specifies that the court will not review the business decisions of directors who performed their duties (1) in good faith; (2) with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances; and (3) in a manner the directors reasonably believe to be in the best ...
Smith v. Van Gorkom 488 A.2d 858 (Del. 1985) [1] is a United States corporate law case of the Delaware Supreme Court, discussing a director's duty of care.It is often called the "Trans Union case".
The duties imposed on directors are fiduciary duties, similar to those that the law imposes on those in similar positions of trust: agents and trustees. The duties apply to each director separately, while the powers apply to the board jointly. Also, the duties are owed to the company itself, and not to any other entity. [41]
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The shareholders of Caremark International, Inc. brought a derivative action, alleging the directors breached their duty of care by failing to put in place adequate internal control systems. This in turn was said to enable the company's employees to commit criminal offences, resulting in substantial fines and civil penalties amounting to over ...