Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Why so much hate against Blue Origin? Mainly centering my post on Blue Origin. Many people frame them as a joke because they have not "launched a single pound to orbit", but this does not make sense because the purpose of Blue Origin was initially space tourism to get a hang on how to make rockets, while SpaceX wanted to be all-encompassing and ...
However, this concern seems almost entirely misplaced. SpaceX has half a decade of experience mass-producing orbital-class (reusable) rockets, (reusable) fairings, and propulsion systems, whereas Blue Origin at best has minimal experience manufacturing a handful of suborbital vehicles over a period of a few years.
The RD-180 engine, the primary booster in all Atlas V launch vehicles, is supplied by NPO Energomash, a Russian company largely owned by the Russian government. The RD-180 operates on a staged combustion cycle using liquid oxygen (LO2, the oxidizer) and Rocket Propellant 1 (RP-1) propellants. Lockheed Martin chose the RD-180 engine for its ...
knowledge vs knowledge. More like wishful thinking with a blank check vs actual aerospace engineering. More like Money vs Knowledge. Blue Origin never had problems with funding, SpaceX on the other hand were almost on the verge of shutting down had their 4th test flight never went successfully.
Blue pays more up front, but annual merit increases are ~0. The bureaucracy at Blue is unfathomable for a startup. Many opportunities to work <40 hours/ week. If you value your free time, pick Blue. If you want a rewarding career but no personal life, take SpaceX. 5.
Up until 2014 his total investment in Blue Origin was around $500M so much less than SpaceX over the same period. Initially Blue concentrated on engines as being the slowest part of any rocket development and have made good progress on that as witness the BE-4, BE-3U and BE-7 that perform key parts of the Blue Moon architecture.
This subreddit is not an official outlet for SpaceX information. Hiring Booms at SpaceX and Blue Origin Making It Hard for NASA to Attract Talent. "hiring booms at high paying, highly engaging company making it hard to attract talent at lower paying goverment job with almost no movement in 30 years " weird.
The price of the ticket is also astronomical for SpaceX though: $200K-$300K vs tens of millions of dollars... Blue Origin's competition for space tourism comes from Virgin, not SpaceX. New Shepard is also just a giant hardware test platform for a number of things they are doing for New Glenn.
SpaceX is an unfair standard to hold anything up to, so Blue Origin should be judged on its own merits. That said, BO's approach is still lacking. With private finances on the level of a first-world nation's national space program, there's no excuse that in 20 years Blue Origin has only managed to build a suborbital spacecraft that's still in ...
SpaceX already has won beating Old Space in the process. BO won't be launching humans to orbit or beyond in this decade. Starship and New Glenn aren't even in the same class of lift vehicle. New Glenn is in the same class as Falcon Heavy which already has three launches whereas it's unlikely that New Glenn will be ready for the 2024 Artemis ...