enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States free speech exceptions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech...

    On entry across borders, the government may bar non-citizens from the United States based on their speech, even if that speech would have been protected if said by a citizen. [84] Speech rules as to deportation, on the other hand, are unclear. [85] Lower courts are divided on the question, while the leading cases on the subject are from the Red ...

  3. Freedom of speech in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the...

    Obscenity, defined by the Miller test by applying contemporary community standards, is a type of speech which is not legally protected. It is speech to which all the following apply: appeals to the prurient interest, depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific ...

  4. Spence v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spence_v._Washington

    Spence v. Washington, 418 U.S. 405 (1974), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with non-verbal free speech and its protections under the First Amendment.The Court, in a per curiam decision, ruled that a Washington state law that banned the display of the American flag adorned with additional decorations was unconstitutional as it violated protected speech.

  5. Trump's mongering of violence isn't protected free speech ...

    www.aol.com/trumps-mongering-violence-isnt...

    That's not protected free speech. Show comments. Advertisement. Advertisement. In Other News. Entertainment. Entertainment. Yahoo News. Our favorite Super Bowl 2025 commercials so far. Entertainment.

  6. Should hate speech be protected under 1st Amendment? Why ...

    www.aol.com/news/hate-speech-protected-under-1st...

    The Buffalo shooting in which 10 Black people were killed begs questions regarding media, freedom of speech and protected messages, Rob Miraldi writes.

  7. Even Hateful Protests Are Protected, Free Speech Group ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/even-hateful-protests-protected...

    Respecting free speech defends individual rights and lets people show us who they are. Skip to main content. 24/7 Help. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to ...

  8. Imminent lawless action - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action

    Under the imminent lawless action test, speech is not protected by the First Amendment if the speaker intends to incite a violation of the law that is both imminent and likely. While the precise meaning of "imminent" may be ambiguous in some cases, the court provided later clarification in Hess v.

  9. Fighting words - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fighting_words

    The fighting words doctrine, in United States constitutional law, is a limitation to freedom of speech as protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In 1942, the U.S. Supreme Court established the doctrine by a 9–0 decision in Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire. [1]