Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
For example, that every equivalence relation is symmetric, but not necessarily antisymmetric, is indicated by in the "Symmetric" column and in the "Antisymmetric" column, respectively. All definitions tacitly require the homogeneous relation R {\displaystyle R} be transitive : for all a , b , c , {\displaystyle a,b,c,} if a R b {\displaystyle ...
For example, the restriction of < from the reals to the integers is still asymmetric, and the converse or dual > of < is also asymmetric. An asymmetric relation need not have the connex property . For example, the strict subset relation ⊊ {\displaystyle \,\subsetneq \,} is asymmetric, and neither of the sets { 1 , 2 } {\displaystyle \{1,2 ...
For example, "is a blood relative of" is a symmetric relation, because x is a blood relative of y if and only if y is a blood relative of x. Antisymmetric for all x, y ∈ X, if xRy and yRx then x = y. For example, ≥ is an antisymmetric relation; so is >, but vacuously (the condition in the definition is always false). [11] Asymmetric
For example, that every equivalence relation is symmetric, but not necessarily antisymmetric, is indicated by in the "Symmetric" column and in the "Antisymmetric" column, respectively. All definitions tacitly require the homogeneous relation R {\displaystyle R} be transitive : for all a , b , c , {\displaystyle a,b,c,} if a R b {\displaystyle ...
However, a relation can be neither symmetric nor asymmetric, which is the case for "is less than or equal to" and "preys on"). Symmetric and antisymmetric (where the only way a can be related to b and b be related to a is if a = b ) are actually independent of each other, as these examples show.
Kayne argues that a theory that allows both directionalities would state that languages are symmetrical, whereas in fact languages are found to be asymmetrical in many respects. Examples of linguistic asymmetries which may be cited in support of the theory (although they do not concern head direction) are:
Throughout, we assume that all matrix entries belong to a field whose characteristic is not equal to 2. That is, we assume that 1 + 1 ≠ 0, where 1 denotes the multiplicative identity and 0 the additive identity of the given field.
In mathematics and theoretical physics, a tensor is antisymmetric on (or with respect to) an index subset if it alternates sign (+/−) when any two indices of the subset are interchanged.