Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A homeowner association (or homeowners' association [HOA], sometimes referred to as a property owners' association [POA], common interest development [CID], or homeowner community) is a private, legally-incorporated organization that governs a housing community, collects dues, and sets rules for its residents. [1] HOAs are found principally in ...
Laws applied Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure , 28 U.S.C. § 1912 Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Woods , 480 U.S. 1 (1987), was a United States Supreme Court case that applied the precedent of Hanna v.
The Court of Appeals of Virginia was established on January 1, 1985, as an intermediate court of limited appellate jurisdiction, initially with ten judges, with an eleventh judge added in 2000. [ 2 ] In March 2021, legislation was passed to expand the jurisdiction and composition of the Court from 11 judges to 17 judges, coming into effect July ...
HOAs may not have the power they think they do. Is your homeowners association driving you crazy? Here are 6 unenforceable HOA rules in the US — and how you can protect your rights ASAP
The number of HOA governed homes is increasing in the U.S., and it is only a matter of time before you, or someone you know, considers moving into one.
The relatively streamlined process of sending a certified question to a state appellate court also relieves federal courts of the unwieldy procedure of Pullman abstention, under which Federal courts abstain from deciding on the constitutionality of state laws while litigation seeking the construction of those laws is pending in state courts. [5]
Sometimes, the appellate court finds a defect in the procedure the parties used in filing the appeal and dismisses the appeal without considering its merits, which has the same effect as affirming the judgment below. (This would happen, for example, if the appellant waited too long, under the appellate court's rules, to file the appeal.)
Furthermore, some laws may still be considered "content-based" even though they appear to be facially content-neutral. [11] Laws are considered "content-based" if they cannot be "justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech" or if they were adopted "because of disagreement with the message [the speech] conveys". [12]