Ad
related to: history or histories difference between two sources based on social studiesThis site is a teacher's paradise! - The Bender Bunch
- Activities & Crafts
Stay creative & active with indoor
& outdoor activities for kids.
- Education.com Blog
See what's new on Education.com,
explore classroom ideas, & more.
- Educational Songs
Explore catchy, kid-friendly tunes
to get your kids excited to learn.
- Lesson Plans
Engage your students with our
detailed lesson plans for K-8.
- Activities & Crafts
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
2. comparative history as parallel demonstration of theory – the emphasis is on identifying similarities across relevant cases; 3. comparative history as contrast of contexts – the emphasis is on the differences between cases and the uniqueness of each case. Scholars that use this approach tends to be wary of drawing broad generalizations.
In recent years most histories of education deal with institutions or focus on the ideas histories of major reformers, [65] but a new social history has recently emerged, focused on who were the students in terms of social background and social mobility. In the US attention has often focused on minority and ethnic students.
A good example of this is the common research program that looks for differences between two or more social systems, then looks at these differences in relation to some other variable coexisting in those societies to see if it is related. [8] The classic case of this is Esping-Andersen's research on social welfare systems.
In many countries' curricula, social studies is the combined study of humanities, the arts, and social sciences, mainly including history, economics, and civics.The term was coined by American educators around the turn of the twentieth century as a catch-all for these subjects, as well as others which did not fit into the models of lower education in the United States such as philosophy and ...
Social history, sometimes called the "new social history", is a broad branch that studies the experiences of ordinary people in the past. [128] [129] It had major growth as a field in the 1960s and 1970s, and still is well represented in history departments. However, after 1980 the "cultural turn" directed the next generation to new topics.
These are sources which, usually, are accounts, works, or research that analyse, assimilate, evaluate, interpret, and/or synthesize primary sources. Tertiary sources are compilations based upon primary and secondary sources and often tell a more generalized account built on the more specific research found in the first two types of sources. [23 ...
A tertiary source is an index or textual consolidation of already published primary and secondary sources [6] that does not provide additional interpretations or analysis of the sources. [ 7 ] [ 8 ] Some tertiary sources can be used as an aid to find key (seminal) sources, key terms, general common knowledge [ 9 ] and established mainstream ...
Historians carry out original research, often using primary sources. Historians often have a PhD or advanced academic training in historiography, but may have an advanced degree in a related social science field or a domain specific field; other scholars and reliable sources will typically use the descriptive label historian to refer to an historian.
Ad
related to: history or histories difference between two sources based on social studiesThis site is a teacher's paradise! - The Bender Bunch