enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Richardson v. Ramirez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richardson_v._Ramirez

    Richardson v. Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24 (1974), [1] was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 6–3, that convicted felons could be barred from voting beyond their sentence and parole without violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.

  3. Trump to test the limits of the First Amendment at high ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/trump-test-limits-first...

    President Donald Trump will test the limits of his free speech rights Monday when he argues to a Washington, DC, appeals court that a gag order placed on him in his federal election subversion ...

  4. Freedom of speech in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech_in_the...

    The First Amendment of the United States Constitution declares that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. [37 ...

  5. The amendment was proposed after the Shelby County v. Holder case overruled parts of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and in light of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. [66] Many key aspects of the amendment were incorporated into the proposed For the People Act, which passed the U.S. House of Representatives. [67]

  6. Kent v. Dulles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_v._Dulles

    The cases were heard on writ of certiorari. [5] The Court reversed the Court of Appeals. Kent v. Dulles was the first case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the right to travel is a part of the "liberty" of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment. It did not decide the extent to which ...

  7. United States v. Alvarez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Alvarez

    The First Amendment Center called the decision "a victory for free speech and common sense." [31] Alvarez's attorney praised the decision, saying "The First Amendment protects a lot of what we as Americans get to say...The government doesn't get to decide what we can and cannot say.” [32]

  8. Requiring ugly images of smoking's harm on cigarettes won't ...

    www.aol.com/news/requiring-ugly-images-smokings...

    It sent the case back to the district court to consider that issue. The images in question include a picture of a woman with a large growth on her neck and the caption “WARNING: Smoking causes ...

  9. The Biggest Players of Jan. 6 Walk Free Thanks To Trump - AOL

    www.aol.com/biggest-players-jan-6-walk-163351630...

    Evidence at Jan. 6 trials showed defendants “expressly viewed themselves as Trump’s army and talked about committing an all-out war to keep Trump in power,” Bloch said.

  1. Related searches swipe free amendment rights examples chart of cases images of trump approval

    proposed amendments to constitutionmorris sheppard proposed amendments