Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
He argued, "The advantage of non-violence as a method of expressing moral goodwill lies in the fact that it protects the agent against the resentments which violent conflict always creates in both parties to a conflict, and it proves this freedom of resentment and ill-will to the contending party in the dispute by enduring more suffering than ...
Berel Lang argues against the conflation of nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience on the grounds that the necessary conditions for an act instancing civil disobedience are: (1) that the act violates the law, (2) that the act is performed intentionally, and (3) that the actor anticipates and willingly accepts punitive measures made on the ...
A conflict between a violent and a nonviolent force is a moral argument. If the violent side can provoke the nonviolent side into violence, the violent side has won. The problem lies not in the nature of man, but in the nature of power. The longer a war lasts, the less popular it becomes.
Argument: Oral argument: Case history; Prior: Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Watt, 703 F.2d 586 (D.C. Cir. 1983); cert. granted, 464 U.S. 812 (1983).: Holding; A rule against camping or overnight sleeping in public parks is not beyond the constitutional power of the Government to enforce
Consequentialism: some advocates base the non-aggression principle on rule utilitarianism or rule egoism. These approaches hold that though violations of the non-aggression principle cannot be claimed to be objectively immoral, adherence to it almost always leads to the best possible results, and so it should be accepted as a moral rule.
“Violence against women and girls is a violation of human rights—it is a crime,” she says. “Every day we hear about more unacceptable cases of violence, which forces us to ask why.
A nonviolent revolution is a revolution conducted primarily by unarmed civilians using tactics of civil resistance, including various forms of nonviolent protest, to bring about the departure of governments seen as entrenched and authoritarian without the use or threat of violence. [1]
Five members of the far-right Proud Boys were "thirsting for violence" on Jan. 6, the Justice Department says in closing arguments at their seditious conspiracy trial.