Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The notion of a legally sanctioned corporation remains controversial for several reasons, most of which stem from the granting of corporations both limited liability on the part of its members and the status and rights of a legal person. Some opponents to this granting of "personhood" to an organization with no personal liability contend that ...
Some large U.S. corporations have used a strategy called tax inversion to change their headquarters to a non-U.S. country to reduce their tax liability. About 46 companies have reincorporated in low-tax countries since 1982, including 15 since 2012. Six more also planned to do so in 2015. [32]
One criticism is that interests, both social and economic, are so diverse that a state cannot possibly define or organize them effectively by incorporating them. [ citation needed ] Corporate statism differs from corporate nationalism in that it is a social mode of organization rather than economic nationalism operating by means of private ...
De Beers is one of the most controversial companies among the biggest monopolies of all time, which is saying something. ... Howard throws 2 TD passes to Smith to help Ohio State rout Tennessee 42 ...
Smith also rejected the very existence of, not just dominant and abusive corporations, but corporations at all. [3] By the latter half of the nineteenth century, it had become clear that large firms had become a fact of the market economy. John Stuart Mill's approach was laid down in his treatise On Liberty (1859). "Again, trade is a social act.
State-owned enterprises such as Vale do Rio Doce, Telebrás, CSN, and Usiminas (most of them mixed-economy companies) were transferred to the private sector as part of this policy. Brazil State Owned Companies Fact Sheet / Download from the planejamento.gov.br website. [4]
The United States federal government chartered and owned corporations operate to provide public services. Unlike government agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, or independent commissions, such as the Federal Communications Commission, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and others, they have a separate legal personality from the federal government.
He therefore argues that anarcho-capitalism is inherently unstable, and would evolve, entirely through the operation of free market forces, into either a single dominant private court with a natural monopoly of justice over the territory (a de facto state), a society of multiple city states, each with a territorial monopoly, or a 'pure anarchy ...