Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Seminole Tribe of Indians of Florida v. Florida, No. 78-cv-6116 (S.D. Fla.) Water rights None: Puyallup Tribe of Indians Settlement Act of 1989 [8] June 21, 1989: Puyallup: Excludes land from settlement in: Puyallup Tribe of Indians v. Port of Tacoma, 717 F.2d 1251 (9th Cir. 1983) Aboriginal title: $162,000,000: Seneca Nation (New York) Land ...
The Connecticut Indian Land Claims Settlement was an Indian Land Claims Settlement passed by the United States Congress in 1983. [1] The settlement act ended a lawsuit by the Mashantucket Pequot Tribe to recover 800 acres of their 1666 reservation in Ledyard, Connecticut. The state sold this property in 1855 without gaining ratification by the ...
Total settlement: $60 million. Deadline to file claim: May 18, 2023. Requirements: Must have been an unlimited data customer between Oct. 1, 2011 and June 30, 2015.
Cobell v. Salazar (previously Cobell v.Kempthorne and Cobell v.Norton and Cobell v.Babbitt) is a class-action lawsuit brought by Elouise Cobell and other Native American representatives in 1996 against two departments of the United States government: the Department of Interior and the Department of the Treasury for mismanagement of Indian trust funds.
The old money versus new money distinction generally delineates between individuals or families with inherited wealth and status, versus those who have acquired it more recently through ...
The class-action suit was filed in October 1996 and is known as Cobell v. Salazar (Salazar was Secretary of Interior when the case was settled.) A negotiated settlement was reached in 2009 by the administration of President Barack Obama. In 2010 Congress passed a bill to appropriate $3.4 billion for settlement of the longstanding class action suit.
Anyone who wants a cut of Oracle's $115 million proposed settlement agreement must submit a claim by or ... action lawsuit in May for $115 ... v. Oracle America, Inc.c/o Settlement ...
Greek Cypriots v. TRNC and HSBC Bank USA: denial of access to land and property: United States District Court for the District of Columbia: GM Instrument Cluster Settlement: owners of vehicles with faulty instrument clusters receive "special coverage" U.S. District Court in Seattle: 2008 Hepting v. AT&T: surveillance of telecommunications ...