Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Trump’s attorneys have mounted a constitutional challenge to the gag order, claiming that it violates a number of his rights – chief among them those guaranteed under the First Amendment.
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. [1] The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action".
The 2024 Ohio redistricting commission initiative was a citizen-initiated constitutional amendment, Issue 1 on the ballot, that was defeated 53.7% to 46.3% in the November 2024 election. [1]
In today’s razor-sharp political environment, almost no one believes Statehouse leaders are equal to the task. That’s why this fall’s debate over a redistricting reform ballot issue is ...
Under the First Amendment, people have the right to complain about government officials and decisions. Trump himself has been safeguarded by this rule when during his New York criminal trial ...
The 2023 Ohio reproductive rights initiative, [2] officially titled "The Right to Reproductive Freedom with Protections for Health and Safety" and listed on the ballot as Issue 1, [3] was a citizen-initiated constitutional amendment adopted on November 7, 2023, by a majority (56.8%) of voters.
The number of respondents who said the First Amendment shouldn’t be changed increased by 10% since 2020. And most Americans surveyed said they still believed the First Amendment is vital to society.
Concerns over the protection of the First Amendment in the upcoming election, and on campuses, are highlighted in the Freedom Forum's annual survey. ... about 36% of Americans consider Trump to be ...