enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Shelby County v. Holder - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelby_County_v._Holder

    Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), is a landmark decision [1] of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and subsection (b) of Section 4 ...

  3. Supreme Court ruling on homelessness leads the way for ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-ruling-homelessness...

    The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling Friday that will allow cities to ban public camping will bolster Florida's recent move to hold local municipalities accountable for their homeless populations.. The ...

  4. How a Supreme Court ruling led to Gavin Newsom’s order on ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-ruling-led-gavin...

    The appellate court relied on a 1962 Supreme Court decision that said the Eighth Amendment prevented criminalizing someone’s status — in Martin v. Boise, the status of homelessness. The 1962 ...

  5. Idaho’s top court just heard arguments against a new Boise ...

    www.aol.com/idaho-top-court-just-heard-235806733...

    The Idaho Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a Boise neighborhood association’s fight to stop the shelter. ... The City Council vote, which was 4-2, with Patrick Bageant and Luci Willits ...

  6. Pitts v. Black - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pitts_v._Black

    The court concluded a specific location where the homeless returns regularly and a place designated to receive mail should satisfy. [7] On 9 October 1984, the court ruled that, by refusing the homeless to register to vote, the New York City Board of Elections was in breach of the equal protection clause under the Fourteen Amendment. [8]

  7. Supreme Court divided on homelessness case that will affect ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-divided...

    The court's three liberals said they were wary of giving cities a broad and unchecked power to use arrests and fines to punish homeless people who are sleeping outside. "Sleeping is a biological ...

  8. Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Community_Access...

    However, in 1979, the Supreme Court case Federal Communications Commission v. Midwest Video Corporation ruled that the FCC did not have the authority to institute this order. In 1984, President Reagan signed the Cable Communications Policy allowing state governments to require cable operators to devote some channels for public access. [ 2 ]

  9. Supreme Court to weigh whether cities can punish homeless ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-weigh-whether...

    The Supreme Court in 2019, before the appointment of Justice Amy Coney Barrett created a 6-3 conservative majority, declined to take up a similar case from Idaho in which the city of Boise was ...