Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
S&P 500 Shiller P/E ratio compared to trailing 12 months P/E ratio. There are multiple versions of the P/E ratio, depending on whether earnings are projected or realized, and the type of earnings. "Trailing P/E" uses the weighted average share price of common shares in issue divided by the net income for the most recent 12-month period. This is ...
The cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio, commonly known as CAPE, [1] Shiller P/E, or P/E 10 ratio, [2] is a stock valuation measure usually applied to the US S&P 500 equity market. It is defined as price divided by the average of ten years of earnings ( moving average ), adjusted for inflation. [ 3 ]
The PEG ratio's validity is particularly questionable when used to compare companies expecting high growth with those expecting low-growth, or to compare companies with high P/E with those with a low P/E. It is more apt to be considered when comparing so-called growth companies (those growing earnings significantly faster than the market).
When you buy stock, you're essentially buying a tiny piece of the company it represents. Understanding how profitable the company is in relation to its stock price can be an important consideration...
In fact, if you're used to staring at REIT P/E ratios of 30-50, you'd probably think REITs are downright cheap when you look at P/FFO. A REIT's P/FFO is a really good way to work out a theoretical ...
A quick and easy way to find these is by searching for stocks with a low price-to-earnings ratio. This results in a slew of stocks with high Why the P/E Ratio Might Be Useless
Math: the four-letter word you can say on TV yet so reviled that people go great lengths to avoid it, even when they know doing so puts their financial well-being in peril. Wait! Don't click away.
A cost-performance ratio with a positive value (i.e. greater than 1) indicates that costs are running under budget. [2] A negative value (i.e. less than 1) indicates that costs are running over budget. [2] However, a neutral cost-performance ratio (between 1.0 and 1.9) could suggest a certain degree of stagnation in the budget.