Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States on the First Amendment right to freedom of the press. The ruling made it possible for The New York Times and The Washington Post newspapers to publish the then- classified Pentagon Papers without risk of government ...
New York Times. March 7, 2007 "Farmers' Right to Sue Grows, Raising Debate on Food Safety". New York Times. June 1. 1999. "Apple growers bruised and bitter after alar scare". New York Times. July 9, 1991. Chilling effect of laws from the Center for Science in the Public Interest
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan is frequently ranked as one of the greatest Supreme Court decisions of the modern era. [ 3 ] The case began in 1960, when The New York Times published a full-page advertisement by supporters of Martin Luther King Jr. that criticized the police in Montgomery, Alabama , for their treatment of civil rights movement ...
A federal appeals court revived Sarah Palin’s libel case against The New York Times on Wednesday, citing errors by a lower court judge, particularly his decision to dismiss the lawsuit while a ...
"New York's abusive use of eminent domain should not stand under the U.S. Constitution. We hope that the Supreme Court rights a historic wrong and affirms that the government can't take private ...
New York Times Co. v. Tasini, 533 U.S. 483 (2001), is a leading decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of copyright in the contents of a newspaper database. It held that The New York Times , in licensing back issues of the newspaper for inclusion in electronic databases such as LexisNexis , could not license the works of ...
(Reuters) -A group of 17 Republican state attorneys general alleged that top U.S. asset managers, including BlackRock and State Street, were making improper or inadequate disclosures about their ...
However, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964), the Supreme Court decided that news organizations are still liable to public figures if the published information is created with actual malice. [ 2 ] The Court ultimately ruled in favor of Butts, and The Saturday Evening Post was ordered to pay $3.06 million to Butts in damages, which was later ...