Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A scoring rubric typically includes dimensions or "criteria" on which performance is rated, definitions and examples illustrating measured attributes, and a rating scale for each dimension. Joan Herman, Aschbacher, and Winters identify these elements in scoring rubrics: [3] - Traits or dimensions serving as the basis for judging the student ...
However, research in South Africa increasingly shows that in spite of increased education and knowledge, people still often do not practice safe sex. [13] Therefore, the logic of a program which relies on education as a means to get people to use condoms may be faulty. This is why it is important to read research that has been done in the area.
Before computers entered the picture, high-stakes essays were typically given scores by two trained human raters. If the scores differed by more than one point, a more experienced third rater would settle the disagreement. In this system, there is an easy way to measure reliability: by inter-rater agreement. If raters do not consistently agree ...
A research question is "a question that a research project sets out to answer". [1] Choosing a research question is an essential element of both quantitative and qualitative research. Investigation will require data collection and analysis, and the methodology for this will vary widely.
For instance, it cost $0.75 per essay for the first and $0.53 for the second in the 1980-1981 Georgia Regents' Testing Program. [62] Later, in terms of expense, holistic scoring of papers by humans could compete even less against machine-scored item tests or machine-rated essays, which cost from around half to a quarter of the cost of human ...
On discussion pages and in edit summaries, shortcuts are often used to refer to policies and guidelines; for example, (no original research), (neutral point of view) and (biographies of living persons). Similar shortcuts are also used for other types of project pages like essays and how-to guides.
Sample point assignments: [5] 1 point for every statement that is widely agreed on to be false. 5 points for each mention of "Einstien" , "Hawkins" or "Feynmann". 10 points for offering prize money to anyone who proves and/or finds any flaws in your theory. 20 points for every use of science fiction works or myths as if they were fact.
Wikipedia:What the Good article criteria are not—GA reviews should be concluded only in accordance with the GA criteria, not personal preferences; Wikipedia:Compare criteria Good v. Featured article; Wikipedia:Did you know eligibility criteria—within 7 days of promotion, a GA article may be nominated for a DYK hook review