enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Mathematical induction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_induction

    Nevertheless, his argument in al-Fakhri is the earliest extant proof of the sum formula for integral cubes. [9] In India, early implicit proofs by mathematical induction appear in Bhaskara's "cyclic method". [10] None of these ancient mathematicians, however, explicitly stated the induction hypothesis.

  3. General Leibniz rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Leibniz_rule

    The proof of the general Leibniz rule [2]: 68–69 proceeds by induction. Let and be -times differentiable functions.The base case when = claims that: ′ = ′ + ′, which is the usual product rule and is known to be true.

  4. Fermat number - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat_number

    The Fermat numbers satisfy the following recurrence relations: = + = + for n ≥ 1, = + = for n2.Each of these relations can be proved by mathematical induction.From the second equation, we can deduce Goldbach's theorem (named after Christian Goldbach): no two Fermat numbers share a common integer factor greater than 1.

  5. Power rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_rule

    In calculus, the power rule is used to differentiate functions of the form () =, whenever is a real number.Since differentiation is a linear operation on the space of differentiable functions, polynomials can also be differentiated using this rule.

  6. Cauchy formula for repeated integration - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_formula_for...

    The Cauchy formula for repeated integration, named after Augustin-Louis Cauchy, allows one to compress n antiderivatives of a function into a single integral (cf. Cauchy's formula). For non-integer n it yields the definition of fractional integrals and (with n < 0) fractional derivatives.

  7. Mathematical proof - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_proof

    For example, we can prove by induction that all positive integers of the form 2n − 1 are odd. Let P(n) represent "2n − 1 is odd": (i) For n = 1, 2n − 1 = 2(1) − 1 = 1, and 1 is odd, since it leaves a remainder of 1 when divided by 2. Thus P(1) is true.

  8. Zeckendorf's theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeckendorf's_theorem

    For n = 1, 2, 3 it is clearly true (as these are Fibonacci numbers), for n = 4 we have 4 = 3 + 1. If n is a Fibonacci number then there is nothing to prove. Otherwise there exists j such that F j < n < F j + 1 . Now suppose each positive integer a < n has a Zeckendorf representation (induction hypothesis) and consider b = n − F j . Since b ...

  9. Structural induction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structural_induction

    Structural induction is a proof method that is used in mathematical logic (e.g., in the proof of Łoś' theorem), computer science, graph theory, and some other mathematical fields. It is a generalization of mathematical induction over natural numbers and can be further generalized to arbitrary Noetherian induction .