Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Paolo Macchiarini (born 22 August 1958) [1] [2] is a thoracic surgeon and former regenerative medicine researcher who became known for research fraud and manipulative behavior. [3] [4] He was convicted of research-related crimes in Italy and Sweden.
IMHS (Institute of Metaphysical Humanistic Science) Metaphysics Institute, Florida; cross-operated alongside Thomas Francis University by the unaccredited International Church of Metaphysical Humanism, Inc. [214] Indian Institute of Alternative Medicine, India [215] [216] Indian Institute of Alternative Medicine and Research, India [215] [216]
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 18 February 2025. This article's lead section may be too long. Please read the length guidelines and help move details into the article's body. (January 2021) This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by adding missing items with reliable ...
Experimental aesthetics is the second oldest research area in psychology, psychophysics being the only field which is older. [1] In his central work Introduction to Aesthetics (Vorschule der Ästhetik) Fechner describes his empirical approach extensively and in detail. Experimental aesthetics is characterized by a subject-based, inductive approach.
Clinical Dermatology Review; ... Journal of Clinical and Experimental Physiology ... Current Research in Scientific Medicine; Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery;
The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) is a Boston-based independent nonprofit organization that seeks to place a value on medical care by providing comprehensive clinical and cost-effectiveness analyses of treatments, tests, and procedures. [1] ICER was founded in about 2005 by physician-researcher Steven D. Pearson. [1]
In mainstream scientific usage, hair analysis is the chemical analysis of a hair sample. The use of hair analysis in alternative medicine as a method of investigation to assist alternative diagnosis is controversial [1] [2] and its use in this manner has been opposed repeatedly by the AMA because of its unproven status and its potential for healthcare fraud.
Despite more than four decades of review, RCT (randomized, controlled trials) and other evaluative methods, even invested researchers delivered the following opinion: [22] One shortcoming is the lack of RCTs to substantiate (or refute) the clinical utility (efficacy, effectiveness) of chiropractic interventions based on MMT findings.