enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Citizens United v. FEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  3. Super PAC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_PAC

    The result of the Citizens United and SpeechNow.org decisions was the rise of a new type of political action committee in 2010, popularly dubbed the "super PAC". [3] In an open meeting on July 22, 2010, the FEC approved two Advisory Opinions to modify FEC policy in accordance with the legal decisions. [4]

  4. Campaign finance reform amendment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_finance_reform...

    The amendment was proposed in response to the implications presented in the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010), a U.S. constitutional law case concerning the regulation of independent political expenditures by corporations, which the nonprofit organization Citizens United challenged on the ...

  5. Citizens United v. FEC - en.wikipedia.org

    en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/page/mobile-html/...

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission , 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution .

  6. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 558

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 558 of the United States ... Citizens United v. FEC: 558 U.S. 310: 2009: ... additional terms ...

  7. Dark money - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_money

    The rise of dark money groups was aided by the U.S. Supreme Court decisions in FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. (2008) and Citizens United v. FEC (2010). [4] In Citizens United, the Court ruled (by a 5–4 vote) that corporations and unions could spend unlimited amounts of money to advocate for or against political candidates. [14]

  8. Trump-Elon Musk interview violated campaign finance ...

    www.aol.com/trump-elon-musk-interview-violated...

    The PAC's name is a reference to a controversial 2010 Supreme Court ruling known as Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which opened the floodgates to unlimited campaign spending ...

  9. Hillary: The Movie - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary:_The_Movie

    In December 2007, Citizens United v.Federal Election Commission. was filed at the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. A special three-judge panel (as specified in BCRA) sided with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) that under the McCain-Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, Hillary: The Movie could not be shown on television right before the 2008 Democratic primaries.