enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Soldal v. Cook County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soldal_v._Cook_County

    Soldal v. Cook County, 506 U.S. 56 (1992), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a seizure of property like that which occurs during an eviction, even absent a search or an arrest, implicates the Fourth Amendment.

  3. Police Cannot Seize Property Indefinitely After an Arrest ...

    www.aol.com/news/police-cannot-seize-property...

    The Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures extends to the length of a seizure, a federal court ruled last week, significantly restricting how long law enforcement ...

  4. Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the...

    The Bill of Rights in the National Archives. The Fourth Amendment (Amendment IV) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights.It prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets requirements for issuing warrants: warrants must be issued by a judge or magistrate, justified by probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and must particularly describe the place to be ...

  5. South Dakota v. Opperman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Dakota_v._Opperman

    Under the Fourth Amendment, "unreasonable" searches and seizures are forbidden. In addition to their law-enforcement duties, the police must engage in what the court has termed a community caretaking role, including such duties as removing obstructions from roadways to ensure the free flow of traffic.

  6. Across Kansas, police conduct illegal search and seizures ...

    www.aol.com/across-kansas-police-conduct-illegal...

    At least 25 times since 2014, courts either ruled that Kansas law enforcement trampled search and seizure protections; or lawsuits alleging Fourth Amendment violations have led to payouts, court ...

  7. California v. Hodari D. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_v._Hodari_D.

    California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case where the Court held that a fleeing suspect is not "seized" under the terms of the Fourth Amendment unless the pursuing officers apply physical force to the suspect or the suspect submits to officers' demands to halt. [1]

  8. Plumhoff v. Rickard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plumhoff_v._Rickard

    Plumhoff v. Rickard, 572 U.S. 765 (2014), is a United States Supreme Court case involving the use of force by police officers during high-speed car chases.After first holding that it had jurisdiction to hear the case, the Court held that the conduct of the police officers involved in the case did not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits unreasonable searches ...

  9. FBI Seized $86 Million From People Not Suspected of Any ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/fbi-seized-86-million-people...

    On Thursday, a federal appeals court will hear about the FBI's "blatant scheme to circumvent" the Fourth Amendment. FBI Seized $86 Million From People Not Suspected of Any Crime. A Federal Court ...