enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Animal rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_rights

    Animal rights is the philosophy according to which many or all sentient animals have moral worth independent of their utility to humans, and that their most basic interests—such as avoiding suffering—should be afforded the same consideration as similar interests of human beings. [2]

  3. Great ape personhood - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_ape_personhood

    Gary Francione questions the concept of granting personhood on the basis of whether the animal is human-like (as some have argued) and believes sentience should be the sole criteria used to determine if an animal should enjoy basic rights. He asserts that several other animals, including mice and rats, should also be granted such rights. [26]

  4. Should animals be considered ‘citizens’ like people? Ethical ...

    www.aol.com/animals-considered-citizens-people...

    The Declaration of Human Rights is nearly 75 years old. But human rights are still a work in progress. It’s worth considering whether the animal rights movement will help or hinder the work of ...

  5. Morals, Reason, and Animals - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morals,_Reason,_and_Animals

    Sapontzis also investigates the issue of wild animal suffering and whether humans have an obligation to help these animals. He questions the view that aiding these individuals is ridiculous or absurd, instead arguing that if we have the means to help an individual suffering in such a situation, we should do so; as long as we do not inflict a ...

  6. Argument from marginal cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_marginal_cases

    The argument from marginal cases (also known as the argument from species overlap) [1] is a philosophical argument within animal rights theory regarding the moral status of non-human animals. Its proponents hold that if human infants, senile people, the comatose, and cognitively disabled people have direct moral status, non-human animals must ...

  7. Biocentrism (ethics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biocentrism_(ethics)

    Similarly, Peter Singer argues that non-human animals deserve the same equality of consideration that we extend to human beings. [10] His argument is roughly as follows: Membership in the species Homo sapiens is the only criterion of moral importance that includes all humans and excludes all non-humans.

  8. History of animal rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_animal_rights

    The ruling said that if human beings are entitled to these rights, animals should be too. The court went beyond the requirements of the Constitution that all living beings should be shown compassion, and said: "It is not only our fundamental duty to show compassion to our animal friends, but also to recognize and protect their rights."

  9. Animal ethics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_ethics

    Animal ethics is a branch of ethics which examines human-animal relationships, the moral consideration of animals and how nonhuman animals ought to be treated. The subject matter includes animal rights, animal welfare, animal law, speciesism, animal cognition, wildlife conservation, wild animal suffering, [1] the moral status of nonhuman animals, the concept of nonhuman personhood, human ...