Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Devin James Stone (born 1983 or 1984) is an American lawyer and YouTuber known for his channel, LegalEagle, [2] where he reviews films and television shows [3] [4] to discuss the level of accuracy of their depictions of the law and courtroom procedure, and to discuss the legal issues raised by those works. He also talks about current legal ...
(2) whether such a post-removal amendment of a complaint precludes a district court from exercising supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff's remaining state-law claims pursuant to : April 29, 2024: October 7, 2024 Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County: 23-975
McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a landmark [1] [2] United States Supreme Court case which held that the domain reserved for the Muscogee Nation by Congress in the 19th century has never been disestablished and constitutes Indian country for the purposes of the Major Crimes Act, meaning that the State of Oklahoma has no right to prosecute American Indians for crimes allegedly ...
Supreme Court terms begin and end in October, and heading into the new year there are major cases awaiting. ... Firearms, and Explosives faces a legal challenge to its Biden-era rule attempting to ...
Republican Donald Trump's return to the presidency is expected to precipitate a shift in the U.S. government's legal stance in major cases pending at the Supreme Court, including a closely watched ...
The U.S. Supreme Court during its last term handed Donald Trump victories in three major cases. Seven important cases featuring Trump as the defendant are currently in the lower courts - two ...
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States.It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases, and over state court cases that turn on questions of U.S. constitutional or federal law.
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. [1] [2] On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of ...