enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia : No original research/Sandbox/Various examples

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original...

    "The main source used to defend a research question. For example, critical essays, documented studies, scholarly or technical journals, or interviews with experts." "Information which has not been interpreted by another person, ie, original articulation of an idea or concept." Definitions of a secondary source:

  3. Wikipedia:These are not original research - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:These_are_not...

    The definition of original research in the policy is: material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist.. This definition is clarified in a footnote: By "exists", the community means that the reliable source must have been published and still exist—somewhere in the world, in any language, whether or not it is reachable online—even if no ...

  4. Wikipedia:No original research - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research

    For questions about whether any particular edit constitutes original research, see the No original research noticeboard. This policy does not apply to talk pages and other pages which evaluate article content and sources, such as deletion discussions or policy noticeboards.

  5. Wikipedia : No original research/Noticeboard/Archive 51

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original...

    It definitely is not original research to note that Seneca said this (we have multiple sources noting that he did so). As to the Due weight/relevance issue (ie: should a specific article mention that Seneca said this)… that is a different question and should be decided by consensus at the article level.

  6. Wikipedia:Core content policies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Core_content...

    No original research – Wikipedia does not publish original thought: all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position not clearly advanced by the sources.

  7. Wikipedia:No original research/Examples - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original...

    The assertion is original research because it is not supported by a source. "Let's trim our hair in accordance with the socialist lifestyle" [1] was part of a North Korean government propaganda campaign promulgating grooming and dress standards. It was broadcast on the state-run Korean Central Television in the capital of Pyongyang. The ...

  8. Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original...

    The following sentence in dispute contains original research not supported by the sources at hand: Polling throughout the election cycle showed that after his indictments began Trumps poll numbers saw an immediate rise which would remain throughout the rest of the election cycle, [1] [2] and after his conviction in New York, polling among republicans showed that the conviction made 34% of them ...

  9. Wikipedia:Common sense is not original research - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Common_sense_is...

    For example, compiling facts into a single place, comparing and contrasting facts, linking to synonymous terms and related topics, and translating from foreign languages is not original research. While errors in performing these tasks may occur, it is usually not disputable that they are true.