Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Open Source Initiative (OSI) is one such organization keeping a list of open-source licenses. [1] The Free Software Foundation (FSF) maintains a list of what it considers free. [ 2 ] FSF's free software and OSI's open-source licenses together are called FOSS licenses.
GitHub: GitHub, Inc. (A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation) 2008-04 No Yes Unknown Denies service to Crimea, North Korea, Sudan, Syria [9] List of government takedown requests. GitLab: GitLab Inc. 2011-09 [10] Partial [11] Yes [12] GitLab FOSS – free software GitLab Enterprise Edition (EE) – proprietary
The Open Source Initiative defines a permissive software license as a "non-copyleft license that guarantees the freedoms to use, modify and redistribute". [6] GitHub's choosealicense website describes the permissive MIT license as "[letting] people do anything they want with your code as long as they provide attribution back to you and don't hold you liable."
The Business Source License (SPDX id BUSL [1]) is a software license which publishes source code but limits the right to use the software to certain classes of users. The BUSL is not an open-source license , [ 1 ] but it is source-available license that also mandates an eventual transition to an open-source license.
Developers have criticized cloud companies that profit from hosting open-source software without contributing money or code upstream, comparing the practice to strip mining. [123] Cloud computing leader Amazon Web Services has stated they comply with licenses and act in their customers' best interests.
Open-source software can also be commercialized from selling services, such as training, technical support, or consulting, rather than the software itself. [5] [6]Another possibility is offering open-source software in source code form only, while providing executable binaries to paying customers only, offering the commercial service of compiling and packaging of the software.
Functional Source License has been introduced in November 2023 by Sentry, as a simpler alternative to Business Source License. [12] It prohibits any "competing" use of the code, to preserve the rights of the author to economically exploit it, but applies for a limited time, after which the code itself is considered to be available under Apache ...
Starting in the mid-1990s and until the mid-2000s, the open-source movement pushed and focused the free-software idea forward in the wider public and business perception. [14] In the Dot-com bubble time, Netscape Communications ' step to release its webbrowser under a FOSS license in 1998, [ 15 ] [ 16 ] inspired many other companies to adapt to ...