Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation , 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001), was a landmark American antitrust law case at the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit .
Microsoft Corp. v. United States, known on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court as United States v. Microsoft Corp., 584 U.S. ___, 138 S. Ct. 1186 (2018), was a data privacy case involving the extraterritoriality of law enforcement seeking electronic data under the 1986 Stored Communications Act (SCA), Title II of the Electronic Communications ...
United States, 390 U.S. 200 (1968) (per curiam) Costello v. United States, 390 U.S. 201 (1968) (per curiam) Piccioli v. United States, 390 U.S. 202 (1968) (per curiam) Forgett v. United States, 390 U.S. 203 (1968) (per curiam) Ortega v. Michigan, 390 U.S. 204 (1968) (per curiam) Stone v. United States, 390 U.S. 204 (1968) (per curiam) Anderson ...
0–9. 1999 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States; 2000 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
The Supreme Court of the United States handed down sixteen per curiam opinions during its 2017 term, which began October 2, 2017, and concluded September 30, 2018. [1] Because per curiam decisions are issued from the Court as an institution, these opinions all lack the attribution of authorship or joining votes to specific justices. All ...
Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U.S. 375 (1963) (per curiam) Ship-By-Truck Co. v. United States, 373 U.S. 376 (1963) (per curiam) Richards v. Pennsylvania, 373 U.S. 376 (1963) (per curiam) Atwood's Transport Lines, Inc. v. United States, 373 U.S. 377 (1963) (per curiam) Drexel v. Ohio Pardon and Parole Comm'n, 373 U.S. 377 (1963) (per curiam ...
The case is New York Times Co v Microsoft Corp et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 23-11195. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama ...
Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's opinion are per curiam. Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly. Justices frequently join multiple opinions in a single case; each vote is subdivided accordingly.