Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Frictional unemployment occurs when a worker is voluntarily between jobs. This is normal and healthy for the economy, as it increases the matches between job openings and seekers. Structural unemployment is caused by structural changes in the economy. This includes technological changes and the movement and relocation of certain industries.
In California, for instance, the state unemployment rate hit 5.3% in February, up 0.8% from a year ago and the highest in the nation. New Jersey's unemployment rate hit 4.8% in February, also up 0.8%.
"Of the roughly 2 percentage-point net increase in the rate of unemployment between the end of 2007 and the end of 2013, about 1 percentage point was the result of cyclical weakness in the demand for goods and services, and about 1 percentage point arose from structural factors; those factors are chiefly the stigma workers face and the erosion ...
Unemployment began to increase, and by the end of 1992, nearly 3,000,000 in the United Kingdom were unemployed, a number that was soon lowered by a strong economic recovery. [146] With inflation down to 1.6% by 1993, unemployment then began to fall rapidly and stood at 1,800,000 by early 1997. [150]
Unemployment shot to 10.8%, which at the time marked its highest level since World War II. Why the US job market has defied rising interest rates and expectations of high unemployment Skip to main ...
The nation’s unemployment last month was 3.8% as the economy added a surprisingly high 303,000 jobs ... Why does California have the nation’s highest unemployment rate? Three sectors were hit hard
Increased requirements on skill (education and experience) on work force, for example because of increased technical complexity, can cause shortage on skilled employees and rising salaries for them, at the same time as uneducated work tasks have in part moved to low salary countries such as in Asia, causing high unemployment. [citation needed]
The Bureau of Labor Statistics said that the surveyors may have miscounted certain people not working due to coronavirus as employed, when they should have been unemployed.