Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Asks whether a claim made is relevant and encyclopedic Template parameters [Edit template data] This template prefers inline formatting of parameters. Parameter Description Type Status reason reason Adds additional text to the end of the text which appears in a tooltip when hovering over the "relevant?" text of the tag. String optional discuss discuss talk The name of the talk page section to ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
The bold links at the top of each cell lead to detailed pages which describe the templates in that section in detail and explain how and when to use them.. If you cannot find the template you are looking for, please click on the section headers that seem most relevant, since there may be templates for a particular usage covered on the detailed pages, but not listed in the table below.
Relevance feedback is a feature of some information retrieval systems. The idea behind relevance feedback is to take the results that are initially returned from a given query, to gather user feedback, and to use information about whether or not those results are relevant to perform a new query. We can usefully distinguish between three types ...
This is the feedback page for Template:Feedback page. No action will be taken based on feedback here if it does not relate to improving the page Template:Feedback page. Other options: If you want to provide feedback about an individual article, use the relevant talk page.
This template's initial visibility currently defaults to autocollapse, meaning that if there is another collapsible item on the page (a navbox, sidebar, or table with the collapsible attribute), it is hidden apart from its title bar; if not, it is fully visible. To change this template's initial visibility, the |state= parameter may be used:
A good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another. Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Is the content up-to-date? Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps?
Following is an approach to determine and name degrees of relevance and how to utilize the results: Relevance level "High" – The highest relevance is objective information directly about the topic of the article. "John Smith is a member of the XYZ organization" in the "John Smith" article is an example of this.