enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Toronto (City) v Ontario (Attorney General) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto_(City)_v_Ontario...

    Abella J, joined by Karakatsanis, Martin and Kasirer JJ. Toronto (City) v Ontario (Attorney General), 2021 SCC 34, is a landmark [2][3] decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on freedom of expression and unwritten constitutional principles. By a 5–4 majority, the court held that the Government of Ontario 's decision to reduce the size of the ...

  3. Anti-homelessness legislation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-homelessness_legislation

    Anti-homelessness legislation. Man sleeps on the street. Anti-homelessness legislation can take two forms: legislation that aims to help and re-house homeless people; and legislation that is intended to send homeless people to homeless shelters compulsorily, or to criminalize homelessness and begging.

  4. Homelessness in Canada - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homelessness_in_Canada

    Graffiti of homeless in Quebec City. Homelessness in Canada was not a social problem until the 1980s. [1] The Canadian government housing policies and programs in place throughout the 1970s were based on a concept of shelter as a basic need or requirement for survival and of the obligation of government and society to provide adequate housing for everyone.

  5. Reference Re Secession of Quebec - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reference_Re_Secession_of...

    The Court. Reference Re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 SCR 217 is a landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada regarding the legality, under both Canadian and international law, of a unilateral secession of Quebec from Canada. Both the Quebec government and the Canadian government stated they were pleased with the Supreme Court's opinion ...

  6. Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_7_of_the_Canadian...

    This argument drew from American case law, but the Supreme Court pointed out section 7 of the Charter contains individual rights, and hence there cannot be family rights. Still, mindful that there was still choices involved in the family situation, the Supreme Court split on whether liberty rights were infringed. Likewise, in I.L.W.U. v.

  7. Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrews_v_Law_Society_of...

    Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia, [1989] 1 SCR 143 is the first Supreme Court of Canada case to deal with the equality rights provided under Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. British law graduate Mark David Andrews challenged the validity of Section 42 of the Barristers and Solicitors Act contending that the ...

  8. Homelessness - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homelessness

    Homelessness, also known as houselessness or being unhoused or unsheltered, is the condition of lacking stable, safe, and functional housing.It includes living on the streets, moving between temporary accommodation with family or friends, living in boarding houses with no security of tenure, [1] and people who leave their homes because of civil conflict and are refugees within their country.

  9. Carter v Canada (AG) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carter_v_Canada_(AG)

    Carter v Canada (AG), 2015 SCC 5 is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision where the prohibition of assisted suicide was challenged as contrary to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter") by several parties, including the family of Kay Carter, a woman suffering from degenerative spinal stenosis, and Gloria Taylor, a woman suffering from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ("ALS ...