enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Physician–patient privilege - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physicianpatient_privilege

    Physicianpatient privilege is a legal concept, related to medical confidentiality, that protects communications between a patient and their doctor from being used against the patient in court. It is a part of the rules of evidence in many common law jurisdictions. Almost every jurisdiction that recognizes physicianpatient privilege not to ...

  3. Therapeutic privilege - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Therapeutic_privilege

    Recognising that therapeutic privilege provides doctors with a significant amount of power over the patient, the court of the Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board 2015 case ruled therapeutic privilege ‘is not intended to subvert that principle by enabling the doctor to prevent the patient from making an informed choice where she is liable to ...

  4. Subpoena duces tecum - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subpoena_duces_tecum

    The federal courts will apply the common law rule of attorney–client privilege unless there is an intervening state law applying to the central issues of the matter. In those cases, the federal court uses the effective state law. [30] [31] Physicianpatient privilege is usually statutorily defined, and can vary from state to state. The ...

  5. Confidentiality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidentiality

    Confidentiality is commonly applied to conversations between doctors and patients. Legal protections prevent physicians from revealing certain discussions with patients, even under oath in court. [6] This physician-patient privilege only applies to secrets shared between physician and patient during the course of providing medical care. [6] [7]

  6. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarasoff_v._Regents_of_the...

    Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient.

  7. Nexus, Christus St. Vincent discord reignites after hospital ...

    www.aol.com/nexus-christus-st-vincent-discord...

    Apr. 20—Several doctors at a Santa Fe practice are up in arms after learning Christus St. Vincent Regional Medical Center leaders revoked their hospital privileges last month, a move the group's ...

  8. The weight loss injection tirzepatide helped Melanie Ressa lose weight and overcome food noise, emotional eating, and mental health challenges. Her story, here.

  9. Category:Privileged communication - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Privileged...

    Physicianpatient privilege; Priest–penitent privilege; Public interest immunity; R. Reporter's privilege; S. Shield laws in the United States; Spousal privilege;