Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The argument from authority is a logical fallacy, [2] and obtaining knowledge in this way is fallible. [ 3 ] [ 4 ] However, in particular circumstances, it is sound to use as a practical although fallible way of obtaining information that can be considered generally likely to be correct if the authority is a real and pertinent intellectual ...
In different jurisdictions, appellate courts are also called appeals courts, courts of appeals, superior courts, or supreme courts. The specific procedures for appealing, including even whether there is a right of appeal from a particular type of decision, can vary greatly from state to state.
It allows the appeals court to substitute its own judgment for the lower court's on how to apply the law. For example, as noted in Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., de novo review is required in the United States when First Amendment issues are raised on appeal. [4]
The High Court remarked negatively upon the CoA's decision to watch the videos in this way. They held in their unanimous acquittal of Cardinal Pell that 'the Court of Appeal ... acted too much like jurors'. [24] The case is the 15th most cited High Court case of all time. [1] [2] Many of its citations are found in appeals of Magistrate court ...
A federal appeals court on Friday upheld a ruling that Oregon defendants must be released from jail after seven days if they don’t have a defense attorney. In its decision, the 9th U.S. Circuit ...
Possible new defendants: Combs' "associates" A new, or superseding, indictment, if one comes, could name new defendants, a possibility that prosecutors have also alluded to in court filings and ...
Three-way judicial race: Aletha Carver vs. Robert Montgomery vs. Jeff Furr Each of the three candidates in this race has a different background ― which each said makes them the best choice.
Justice Cory, for the majority, denied the appeal.. In considering the recharge, he found that the judge erred. It is incorrect to instruct a jury in a criminal case that, in order to render a verdict, they must decide whether they believe the defence evidence or the Crown's evidence. Putting this either/or proposition to the jury excludes the third alternative; namely, that the jury, without ...