enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. The Case for Animal Rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Case_for_Animal_Rights

    The Case for Animal Rights is a 1983 book by the American philosopher Tom Regan, in which the author argues that at least some kinds of non-human animals have moral rights because they are the "subjects-of-a-life", and that these rights adhere to them whether or not they are recognized. [1]

  3. Animal rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_rights

    The vast majority of animals have no legally recognised rights. [12] Critics of animal rights argue that nonhuman animals are unable to enter into a social contract, and thus cannot have rights, a view summarised by the philosopher Roger Scruton, who writes that only humans have duties, and therefore only humans have rights. [13]

  4. Should animals be considered ‘citizens’ like people? Ethical ...

    www.aol.com/animals-considered-citizens-people...

    The Bronx Zoo case went to the New York Supreme Court, which held that nonhuman animals do not have habeus corpus rights. Animal cruelty laws currently exist. It would be useful to improve those ...

  5. Arthur Schopenhauer's view on animal rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Schopenhauer's_view...

    Arthur Schopenhauer was an early defender of animal rights. Arthur Schopenhauer was a 19th-century German philosopher. He was an early defender of animal rights, going against the prevailing idea at the time that animals had no rights and only had instrumental value to humans. According to Schopenhauer, "The assumption that animals are without ...

  6. Former college professor argues animals should be allowed to vote

    www.aol.com/news/former-college-professor-argues...

    Former Rowan University philosophy professor Ioan-Radu Motoarcă argued that animals should have voting rights in a paper he wrote for the journal Analysis.

  7. Argument from marginal cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_marginal_cases

    That is why a cow has no rights, though a human being reduced to the mental level of a cow does have them. There's something wrong with the human; there's nothing wrong with the cow. One might say that in the case of the cow-minded human, there's a blank spot where her moral agency is supposed to be, and someone else can step into that blank ...

  8. Animals, Men and Morals - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animals,_Men_and_Morals

    I don't hold animals superior or even equal to humans. The whole case for behaving decently to animals rests on the fact that we are the superior species. We are the species uniquely capable of imagination, rationality and moral choice – and that is precisely why we are under the obligation to recognise and respect the rights of animals. [2]

  9. Animal ethics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_ethics

    Animal ethics is a branch of ethics which examines human-animal relationships, the moral consideration of animals and how nonhuman animals ought to be treated. The subject matter includes animal rights, animal welfare, animal law, speciesism, animal cognition, wildlife conservation, wild animal suffering, [1] the moral status of nonhuman animals, the concept of nonhuman personhood, human ...