Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Because the set of primes is a computably enumerable set, by Matiyasevich's theorem, it can be obtained from a system of Diophantine equations. Jones et al. (1976) found an explicit set of 14 Diophantine equations in 26 variables, such that a given number k + 2 is prime if and only if that system has a solution in nonnegative integers: [7]
A more recent "elementary" proof of the prime number theorem uses ergodic theory, due to Florian Richter. [28] The prime number theorem is obtained there in an equivalent form that the Cesàro sum of the values of the Liouville function is zero.
Legendre's formula can be used to prove Kummer's theorem. As one special case, it can be used to prove that if n is a positive integer then 4 divides ( 2 n n ) {\displaystyle {\binom {2n}{n}}} if and only if n is not a power of 2.
The question of how many integer prime numbers factor into a product of multiple prime ideals in an algebraic number field is addressed by Chebotarev's density theorem, which (when applied to the cyclotomic integers) has Dirichlet's theorem on primes in arithmetic progressions as a special case.
Pages in category "Theorems about prime numbers" The following 31 pages are in this category, out of 31 total. ... Prime number theorem; Proth's theorem; R.
If n is a power of an odd prime number the formula for the totient says its totient can be a power of two only if n is a first power and n − 1 is a power of 2. The primes that are one more than a power of 2 are called Fermat primes, and only five are known: 3, 5, 17, 257, and 65537. Fermat and Gauss knew of these.
Any prime number is prime to any number it does not measure. [note 6] Proposition 30 If two numbers, by multiplying one another, make the same number, and any prime number measures the product, it also measures one of the original numbers. [note 7] Proof of 30 If c, a prime number, measure ab, c measures either a or b. Suppose c does not measure a.
We can find quadratic residues or verify them using the above formula. To test if 2 is a quadratic residue modulo 17, we calculate 2 (17 − 1)/2 = 2 8 ≡ 1 (mod 17), so it is a quadratic residue. To test if 3 is a quadratic residue modulo 17, we calculate 3 (17 − 1)/2 = 3 8 ≡ 16 ≡ −1 (mod 17), so it is not a quadratic residue.