Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Appeals from the Court of Appeal lie with the Supreme Court of Canada, Canada's court of last resort. Other than certain criminal matters, appeals to the Supreme Court of Canada are heard only by leave of that court. Since the Supreme Court denies leave in most cases, the Court of Appeal is the final court for most matters originating in Alberta.
Atlantic Lottery Corporation Inc. v Babstock, 2020 SCC 19 : December 3, 2019 July 24, 2020 British Columbia (Attorney General) v Provincial Court Judges' Association of British Columbia, 2020 SCC 20 : December 9, 2019 July 31, 2020 Nova Scotia (Attorney General) v Judges of the Provincial Court and Family Court of Nova Scotia, 2020 SCC 21
Central Alberta Dairy Pool v Alberta (Human Rights Commission), [1990] 2 SCR 489, is a leading human rights law decision of the Supreme Court of Canada.The Court expanded on the concept of accommodation up to undue hardship first established in Ontario (Human Rights Commission) v Simpsons-Sears Ltd, [1985] 2 SCR 536 and provided a set of factors to consider when evaluating undue hardship.
The NFL is free to appeal the verdict, and it is certainly naive to expect a pack of billionaires to consider doing the “right” thing, but it doesn’t excuse them if they don’t.
The NFL's potential bill, as ordered by a federal jury, consists of $4.7 billion in residential class damages and $96 million in commercial class damages to the plaintiffs representing the ...
Former NFL coach Jon Gruden lost a Nevada Supreme Court ruling Tuesday in a contract interference and conspiracy lawsuit he filed against the league after he resigned from the Las Vegas Raiders in ...
Script logo used by the Redskins (1972–2020). Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo, 415 F.3d 44 (D.C. Cir. 2005), [1] is a case in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia considered the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office's Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to cancel the registration of the Washington Redskins football team, based on the claim that the ...
Deschamps and Rothstein JJ. took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Canadian Western Bank v Alberta [2007] 2 S.C.R. 3 is a landmark decision in Canadian constitutional law by the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) relating to the division of powers between Federal and Provincial legislative bodies.